Legislature(2015 - 2016)
2015-03-12 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0450 HB 72 The following, which was returned to second reading (page 446), was before the House: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 72(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and loan program expenses of state government and for certain programs and capitalizing funds; and providing for an effective date." Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that the House rescind previous action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 2 (page 449). There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 (page 447) be adopted. There was objection. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 4 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0451 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Edgmon, Nageak Absent: Kreiss-Tomkins, Lynn, Munoz, Seaton And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representatives Drummond, Kawasaki, Gara, Tuck, Ortiz, Claman, Josephson, Tarr, Gruenberg, Kito, and Guttenberg: Page 12, line 3: Delete "230,844,200" Insert "233,681,700" Delete "23,274,200" Insert "26,111,700" Page 12, line 15: Delete "7,850,900" Insert "8,788,400" Page 12, following line 15: Insert new material to read: "ALLOCATIONS Pre-Kindergarten Grants 1,900,000" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Drummond moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. Representative Lynn objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0452 CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Edgmon, Nageak And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Amendment No. 4 was offered by Representatives Tuck, Drummond, Kito, Gara, Kawasaki, Guttenberg, and Gruenberg: Page 12, line 3: Delete "230,844,200" Insert "231,131,700" Delete "23,274,200" Insert "23,561,700" Page 12, line 15: Delete "7,850,900" Insert "8,138,400" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 4 be adopted. Representative Gattis objected. **The presence of Representative Edgmon, who was excused (page 450), was noted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 4 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0453 CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 4 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 4 was not adopted. Amendment No. 5 was offered by Representatives Gara, Tuck, Kito, Drummond, Kawasaki, Wool, Josephson, Tarr, Claman, and Guttenberg: Page 1, line 2, following "funds;" (title amendment): Insert "lapsing appropriations;" Page 55, following line 10: Insert a new subsection to read: "(c) It is the intent of the legislature that, notwithstanding AS 43.20.053 and AS 43.55.028, the Department of Revenue may not pay refunds or make payments claimed in an amount exceeding $2,500,000 for each in-state refinery for which qualified expenditures are incurred under AS 43.20.053(a) for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016." Page 61, following line 13: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 14. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT. The sum of $62,243,700 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Education and Early Development to be distributed as state aid to districts according to the average daily membership for each district adjusted under AS 14.17.410(b)(1)(A) - (D) for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016." 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0454 Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 61, line 20: Delete "sec. 24(l)" Insert "sec. 25(l)" Page 73, line 18: Delete "sec. 14(b)" Insert "sec. 15(b)" Page 78, line 28, following "APPROPRIATIONS.": Insert "(a)" Page 78, line 29: Delete "24 - 26" Insert "25 - 27" Page 78, following line 29: Insert a new subsection to read: "(b) The sum of $6,000,000 of the unexpended and unobligated balances of the appropriations made in sec. 4, ch. 16, SLA 2013, page 105, lines 20 - 24, andsec. 4, ch. 18, SLA 2014, page 87, lines 10 - 11, lapse into the general fund on June 30, 2015. It is the intent of the legislature that funds lapsed under this subsection will not result in a decrease in personnel." Page 79, line 4: Delete "Section 31" Insert "Section 32" Page 79, line 5: Delete "Section 25(c)" Insert "Section 26(c)" Page 79, line 6: Delete "secs. 32 and 33" Insert "secs. 33 and 34" 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0455 Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 5 be adopted. Representative Wilson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 5 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 5 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 5 was not adopted. Amendment No. 6 was offered by Representatives Gara, Kito, Josephson, Tuck, Drummond, Kawasaki, Wool, Claman, Tarr, and Guttenberg: Page 1, line 2, following "funds;" (title amendment): Insert "lapsing appropriations;" Page 55, following line 10: Insert a new subsection to read: "(c) It is the intent of the legislature that, notwithstanding AS 43.20.053 and AS 43.55.028, the Department of Revenue may not pay refunds or make payments claimed in an amount exceeding $2,500,000 for each in-state refinery for which qualified expenditures are incurred under AS 43.20.053(a) for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016." 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0456 Page 61, following line 13: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 14. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AND EARLY DEVELOPMENT. The sum of $32,243,700 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Education and Early Development to be distributed as state aid to districts according to the average daily membership for each district adjusted under AS 14.17.410(b)(1)(A) - (D) for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 61, line 20: Delete "sec. 24(l)" Insert "sec. 25(l)" Page 73, line 18: Delete "sec. 14(b)" Insert "sec. 15(b)" Page 78, line 28, following "APPROPRIATIONS.": Insert "(a)" Page 78, line 29: Delete "24 - 26" Insert "25 - 27" Page 78, following line 29: Insert a new subsection to read: "(b) The sum of $6,000,000 of the unexpended and unobligated balances of the appropriations made in sec. 4, ch. 16, SLA 2013, page 105, lines 20 - 24, andsec. 4, ch. 18, SLA 2014, page 87, lines 10 - 11, lapse into the general fund on June 30, 2015. It is the intent of the legislature that funds lapsed under this subsection will not result in a decrease in personnel." Page 79, line 4: Delete "Section 31" Insert "Section 32" 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0457 Page 79, line 5: Delete "Section 25(c)" Insert "Section 26(c)" Page 79, line 6: Delete "secs. 32 and 33" Insert "secs. 33 and 34" Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 6 be adopted. Representative Thompson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 6 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 6 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 6 was not adopted. Amendment No. 7 was offered by Representatives Wool, Josephson, Tuck, Gara, Kito, Drummond, Kawasaki, Tarr, Claman, and Guttenberg: Page 38, line 25: Delete "907,943,400" Insert "917,943,400" Delete "672,237,900" Insert "682,237,900" 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0458 Page 39, line 8: Delete "34,778,300" Insert "36,255,740" Page 39, line 9: Delete "17,859,100" Insert "18,748,820" Page 39, line 11: Delete "11,965,700" Insert "12,068,820" Page 39, line 13: Delete "268,207,300" Insert "270,918,420" Page 39, line 14: Delete "3,192,700" Insert "3,211,700" Page 39, line 16: Delete "16,738,400" Insert "16,870,160" Page 39, line 17: Delete "5,827,600" Insert "5,876,640" Page 39, line 18: Delete "11,289,600" Insert "11,383,280" Page 39, line 19: Delete "7,741,400" Insert "7,800,440" Page 39, line 21: Delete "4,113,200" Insert "4,139,920" 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0459 Page 39, line 22: Delete "2,455,200" Insert "2,473,440" Page 39, line 23: Delete "11,486,600" Insert "11,596,600" Page 39, line 25: Delete "266,871,500" Insert "269,893,660" Page 39, line 26: Delete "5,734,500" Insert "5,767,500" Page 39, line 27: Delete "6,806,300" Insert "6,865,260" Page 39, line 28: Delete "4,611,000" Insert "4,641,680" Page 39, line 29: Delete "143,617,700" Insert "143,986,820" Page 39, line 31: Delete "14,262,400" Insert "14,370,200" Page 39, line 33: Delete "10,715,300" Insert "10,735,300" Page 40, line 4: Delete "43,631,600" Insert "44,193,720" 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0460 Page 40, line 5: Delete "5,505,200" Insert "5,551,680" Page 40, line 6: Delete "8,152,200" Insert "8,213,000" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Wool moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 7 be adopted. Representative Reinbold objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 7 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 7 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 7 was not adopted. Amendment No. 8 was offered by Representatives Claman, Kito, Kawasaki, Josephson, Tuck, Gara, Drummond, Tarr, Gruenberg, and Guttenberg: Page 13, lines 10 - 13: Delete all material. 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0461 Representative Claman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 8 be adopted. Representative Gattis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 8 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 8 YEAS: 14 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Reinbold, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak Absent: Hughes And so, Amendment No. 8 was not adopted. Amendment No. 9 was offered by Representatives Guttenberg, Kito, Kawasaki, Drummond, Josephson, Claman, and Tuck: Page 24, line 10: Delete "33,453,400" Insert "33,909,400" Delete "15,451,400" Insert "15,907,400" Page 24, line 12: Delete "25,524,500" Insert "25,980,500" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0462 Representative Guttenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 9 be adopted. Representative Wilson objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 9 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 9 YEAS: 11 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 9 was not adopted. Amendment No. 10 was offered by Representatives Tarr, Kawasaki, Kito, Tuck, Gara, Drummond, Josephson, Guttenberg, and Gruenberg: Page 19, line 18: Delete "317,239,200" Insert "323,110,400" Delete "169,784,000" Insert "175,655,200" Page 19, line 25: Delete "17,240,700" Insert "23,111,900" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0463 Representative Tarr moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 10 be adopted. Representative Saddler objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 10 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 10 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Excused: Nageak Absent: Vazquez And so, Amendment No. 10 was not adopted. Amendment No. 11 was offered by Representatives Gara, Kawasaki, Kito, Tuck, Drummond, Tarr, and Guttenberg: Page 18, line 8: Delete "136,526,800" Insert "140,146,500" Delete "83,045,000" Insert "85,983,000" Delete "53,481,800" Insert "54,163,500" Page 18, line 13: Delete "52,448,400" Insert "55,856,800" 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0464 Page 18, line 14: Delete "12,253,400" Insert "12,464,700" Page 18, following line 14: Insert new material to read: "It is the intent of the legislature that the Department of Health and Social Services, office of children's services, partner with the Department of Health and Social Services, division of public assistance, to use $2,938,400 in federal receipt authority to provide funding for child advocacy centers, and the General Funds that formerly funded these centers, to pay office of children's services personnel, and for employment training vouchers." Page 61, following line 13: Insert a new bill section to read: "* Sec. 15. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES. If any portion of the temporary assistance for needy families grants is not received for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016, that amount is appropriated from the general fund to Department of Health and Social Services, family preservation, for child advocacy centers and an equal amount is decremented from the Department of Health and Social Services, front line social workers for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016." Renumber the following bill sections accordingly. Page 61, line 20: Delete "sec. 24(l)" Insert "sec. 25(l)" Page 78, line 29: Delete "24 - 26" Insert "25 - 27" Page 79, line 4: Delete "Section 31" Insert "Section 32" 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0465 Page 79, line 5: Delete "Section 25(c)" Insert "Section 26(c)" Page 79, line 6: Delete "secs. 32 and 33" Insert "secs. 33 and 34" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 11 be adopted. Representative Saddler objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 11 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 11 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson Excused: Nageak Absent: Vazquez And so, Amendment No. 11 was not adopted. Amendment No. 12 was offered by Representatives Claman, Kawasaki, Kito, Tuck, Gara, Drummond, Josephson, Tarr, and Guttenberg: 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0466 Page 4, line 21: Delete "4,096,100" Insert "4,308,900" Delete "3,996,100" Insert "4,208,900" Page 4, line 28: Delete "2,536,600" Insert "2,706,900" Page 4, line 29: Delete "633,300" Insert "675,800" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Claman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 12 be adopted. Representative Gattis objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 12 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 12 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 24 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak Absent: Colver, Reinbold And so, Amendment No. 12 was not adopted. 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0467 Amendment No. 13 was offered by Representatives Kito, Josephson, Kawasaki, Gara, Tuck, Drummond, Tarr, Guttenberg, and Gruenberg: Page 6, line 3: Delete "12,609,000" Insert "12,709,000" Delete "7,622,900" Insert "7,722,900" Page 6, line 4: Delete "10,479,200" Insert "10,579,200" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Kito moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 13 be adopted. Representative Pruitt objected. Representative LeDoux moved and asked unanimous consent that she be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and Representative LeDoux was required to vote. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 13 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 13 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0468 Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 13 was not adopted. Amendment No. 14 was offered by Representatives Claman, Ortiz, Kawasaki, Kito, Josephson, Drummond, Guttenberg, and Gruenberg: Page 30, line 16: Delete "130,743,200" Insert "131,581,500" Delete "119,288,400" Insert "120,126,700" Page 30, line 32: Delete "7,375,500" Insert "7,567,000" Page 31, line 3: Delete "21,802,600" Insert "21,949,400" Page 31, line 4: Delete "4,421,000" Insert "4,921,000" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Claman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 14 be adopted. Representative Edgmon objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 14 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 14 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0469 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 14 was not adopted. Amendment No. 15 was offered by Representatives Kito, Wool, Gara, Tuck, Drummond, Kawasaki, Tarr, Claman, Kreiss-Tomkins, Guttenberg, and Gruenberg: Page 1, line 2, following "funds;" (title amendment): Insert "lapsing appropriations" Page 38, line 8: Delete "155,173,400" Insert "157,173,400" Delete "153,340,000" Insert "155,340,000" Page 38, line 9: Delete "111,505,100" Insert "113,505,100" Page 78, line 28, following "APPROPRIATIONS.": Insert "(a)" Page 78, following line 28: Insert a new subsection to read: "(b) The sum of $5,000,000 of the unexpended and unobligated balance of the appropriation made in sec. 1, ch. 18, SLA 2014, page 63, line 4, and allocated on page 63, line 11, lapses into the general fund on June 30, 2015." Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0470 Representative Kito moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 15 be adopted. Representative Munoz objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 15 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 15 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 15 was not adopted. Amendment No. 16 was offered by Representatives Kito, Kawasaki, Josephson, Gara, Tuck, Drummond, Tarr, Claman, and Guttenberg: Page 34, following line 12: Insert "It is the intent of the legislature that the Department of Transportation and Public Facilities sell, at or above fair market value, the steel culverts and pipes that were purchased for the Juneau Access Improvement Project from LeBarge Pipe and Contech Construction Products and that are currently stored in Seattle, Washington." Representative Kito moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 16 be adopted. Representative Thompson objected. 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0471 The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 16 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 16 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 25 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak Absent: Reinbold And so, Amendment No. 16 was not adopted. Amendment No. 17 was offered by Representatives Gara, Drummond, and Guttenberg: Page 7, line 10: Delete "11,964,400" Insert "8,964,400" Delete "9,264,400" Insert "6,264,400" Page 7, line 16: Delete "11,964,400" Insert "8,964,400" Page 61, following line 13: Insert a new subsection to read: "(h) An amount not to exceed $1,500,000 is appropriated from the general fund to the Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, tourism marketing, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016, for the purpose of matching, on a dollar-for-dollar 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0472 basis, industry contributions in excess of $2,700,000 for tourism marketing for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016." Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 17 be adopted. There was objection. Representative Gara moved and asked unanimous consent to withdraw Amendment No. 17. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 18 was offered by Representatives Josephson, Claman, Gara, Kito, Drummond, Tarr, Kreiss-Tomkins, and Guttenberg: Page 1, line 2, following "funds;" (title amendment): Insert "lapsing appropriations;" Page 78, line 28, following "APPROPRIATIONS.": Insert "(a)" Page 78, following line 29: Insert a new subsection to read: "(b) The sum of $6,000,000 of the unexpended and unobligated balances of the appropriations made in sec. 4, ch. 16, SLA 2013, page 105, lines 20 - 24, andsec. 4, ch. 18, SLA 2014, page 87, lines 10 - 11, lapse into the general fund on June 30, 2015. It is the intent of the legislature that funds lapsed under this subsection will not result in a decrease in personnel." Representative Josephson moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 18 be adopted. Representative Pruitt objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 18 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0473 CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 18 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 18 was not adopted. Amendment No. 19 was offered by Representatives Tarr, Josephson, Gara, Tuck, Kito, Drummond, Kreiss-Tomkins, Guttenberg, and Gruenberg: Page 1, line 2, following "funds;" (title amendment): Insert "lapsing appropriations;" Page 78, line 28, following "APPROPRIATIONS.": Insert "(a)" Page 78, following line 29: Insert a new subsection to read: "(b) The unexpended and unobligated balance, estimated to be $17,973,847 of the appropriation made in sec. 1, ch. 16, SLA 2013, page 12, lines 20 - 25, lapses into the general fund on June 30, 2015." Representative Tarr moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 19 be adopted. Representative Pruitt objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 19 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0474 CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 19 YEAS: 13 NAYS: 26 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 19 was not adopted. Amendment No. 20 was offered by Representatives Kito, Gara, Tuck, Drummond, Claman, and Guttenberg: Page 29, line 5: Delete "70,417,700" Insert "70,625,900" Delete "52,689,000" Insert "52,897,200" Page 29, line 8: Delete "5,227,200" Insert "5,435,400" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Kito moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 20 be adopted. Representative Pruitt objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 20 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0475 CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 20 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Seaton, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Josephson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak And so, Amendment No. 20 was not adopted. Amendment No. 21 was offered by Representatives Guttenberg and Josephson: Page 29, line 3: Delete "13,947,800" Insert "14,244,700" Delete "9,655,700" Insert "9,952,600" Page 29, line 4: Delete "13,947,800" Insert "14,244,700" Page 29, line 5: Delete "70,417,700" Insert "71,818,600" Delete "52,689,000" Insert "54,089,900" Page 29, line 8: Delete "5,227,200" Insert "5,442,600" 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0476 Page 29, line 12: Delete "8,329,200" Insert "9,514,700" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Guttenberg moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 21 be adopted. There was objection. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 21 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 21 YEAS: 9 NAYS: 28 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Nays: Chenault, Claman, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Excused: Nageak Absent: Drummond, Hawker And so, Amendment No. 21 was not adopted. CSHB 72(FIN) was automatically in third reading. Representatives Hughes, LeDoux, Pruitt, Edgmon, Herron, Tilton, Vazquez, Reinbold, and Claman moved and asked unanimous consent that they be allowed to abstain from voting because of a conflict of interest. Objection was heard, and the members were required to vote. The question being: "Shall CSHB 72(FIN) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: 2015-03-12 House Journal Page 0477 CSHB 72(FIN) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 25 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Chenault, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Keller, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson Nays: Claman, Drummond, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, Ortiz, Reinbold, Tarr, Tuck, Wool Excused: Nageak And so, CSHB 72(FIN) passed the House. Representative Millett moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 72(FIN) Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 33 NAYS: 6 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Chenault, Claman, Colver, Edgmon, Foster, Gattis, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Herron, Hughes, Johnson, Kawasaki, Keller, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Lynn, Millett, Munoz, Neuman, Olson, Ortiz, Pruitt, Reinbold, Saddler, Seaton, Stutes, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Vazquez, Wilson, Wool Nays: Drummond, Gara, Josephson, Kito, Tarr, Tuck Excused: Nageak And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 72(FIN) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.